It isn’t as good as the Sony A7R III, despite costing 200 quid more, but realistically, Sony had a freakin’ five-year head start.
from gizmodo http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2018/10/nikon-z7-review-a-worthy-mirrorless-contender-but-not-a-sony-killer/
from gizmodo http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2018/10/nikon-z7-review-a-worthy-mirrorless-contender-but-not-a-sony-killer/
Comments
Post a Comment