Skip to main content

Courting Visibility: Value Stream Management

“If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”

It’s an old management saw, but one rooted in truth, especially in the arena of software development where establishing a common vision and language of success can be so important. DevOps practices have for years given organizations a model for linking and streamlining processes, enabling both continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD). But as GigaOm VP of Research Jon Collins explains, businesses still struggle with understanding the actual value derived from these processes.

In his recent Strategy Considerations report, “Driving Value Through Visibility,” Jon emphasizes that delivering on innovation requires more than moving from a project to a product mindset. It hinges on the ability to measure success, across both the products you create and the processes you use to create them.

“Across organizations today, we’re seeing DevOps have to up the ante—to move beyond simply doing things faster and towards enabling software-based innovation to take place in a managed, well-governed way,” Jon explains in an interview. “Value Stream Management (VSM) is an essential tool in the DevOps governance tool chest, helping deliver both more efficient pipelines and higher-value results.”

At the core of VSM is the concept of visibility, which makes it possible for organizations to apply the right process to the right goals. In the report, Jon points out that visibility confers the insight needed for managers to set goals and prioritize activities, for process owners to identify bottlenecks and address their causes, and for all stakeholders to gain a common basis on which to collaborate. Within the context of VSM, visibility does two things:

  • Ensure efficiency (“doing things right”): This is about minimizing wasteful activity and maximizing both productivity and job satisfaction.
  • Ensure effectiveness (“doing the right thing”): This involves delivering results of maximum value to the business, making best practices repeatable, and replicating success across teams.

Figure 1: VSM Considers Both Efficiency and Effectiveness

This isn’t about process efficiency—well, it is, but that’s more a means than an end when it comes to achieving business goals. Rather, developing visibility is about ensuring that your delivery cycles work in lockstep with the needs of business leaders to yield positive outcomes and maximize your innovation process. In short, it becomes the link between IT and the business—two entities that too often stand at opposite ends of a chasm.

The steep advantage versus AWS comes in large part from Azure Hybrid Benefit licensing, which enables Microsoft customers to apply their existing Windows Server and SQL Server licenses to Azure virtual machines and Azure SQL Database instances. And that can yield more than $10,000 in savings for an Azure migration compared to AWS.

Learn more about Collins’ Strategy Considerations Report, “Driving Value Through Visibility.”



from Gigaom https://gigaom.com/2020/10/23/courting-visibility-value-stream-management/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is NetApp?

At Cloud Field Day 9 Netapp presented some of its cloud solutions. This comes on the heels of NetApp Insight , the annual corporate event that should give its user base not just new products but also a general overview of the company strategy for the future. NetApp presented a lot of interesting news and projects around multi-cloud data and system management. The Transition to Data Fabric This is not the first time that NetApp radically changed its strategy. Do you remember when NetApp was the boring ONTAP-only company? Not that there is anything wrong with ONTAP of course (the storage OS originally designed by NetApp is still at the core of many of its storage appliances). It just can’t be the solution for everything, even if it does work pretty well. When ONTAP was the only answer to every question (even with StorageGrid and EF systems already part of the portfolio), the company started to look boring and, honestly, not very credible. The day the Data Fabric vision was announced

Inside Research: People Analytics

In a recent report, “ Key Criteria for Evaluating People Analytics ,” distinguished analyst Stowe Boyd looks at the emerging field of people analytics, and examines the platforms that focus on human resources and the criteria with which to best judge their capabilities. Stowe in the report outlines the table stakes criteria of People Analytics—the essential features and capabilities without which a platform can’t be considered relevant in this sector. These include basic analytic elements such as recording performance reviews, attendance monitoring, and integration with other HR tools. The report also defines the key criteria, or the features that actively differentiate products within the market and help organizations to choose an appropriate solution. These criteria include: Full employee life cycle tracking Support for different employee types (seasonal or freelance workers) Employee surveys Diversity and inclusion monitoring Stowe also looks at the rapid innovation and em